Jump to content

  •  

Penguin Random House & other major publishers sue Florida over book bans in schools


Marshy

Recommended Posts

Major-Publishing-Houses-Penguin-Sue-Florida-Book-Censorship-Bans-1.jpg

 

Six major publishing houses are turning the page on censorship and taking Florida to court over a contentious new law. Penguin Random House, Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishers, Simon & Schuster, and Sourcebooks have incited a literary rebellion against the Sunshine State to challenge House Bill 1069, which allows parents to contest and potentially remove books from school libraries if deemed inappropriate or pornographic by school boards.

 

Filed in the US District Court in Orlando, the lawsuit argues that the legislation imposes strict censorship, trampling on First Amendment rights. The publishers contend that the bill broadly regulates book availability without considering their literary, artistic, political, scientific, or educational merits. They’re not alone in this fight—acclaimed authors John Green and Jodi Picoult have joined the fray, alongside the Authors Guild.

 

According to the plaintiffs, the impact of this law is far-reaching. They claim hundreds of books have been pulled from shelves, including timeless classics like Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities and Anne Frank’s The Diary of a Young Girl. The vague nature of the restrictions, they argue, has created a chilling effect, leading to the removal of far more books than the First Amendment would typically allow.

 

Florida’s Department of Education stands by the law, asserting its aim is to shield students from sexually explicit and inappropriate content. However, the plaintiffs maintain that the implementation has resulted in censorship of constitutionally protected works vital for education.

 

The publishing houses clarify they’re not seeking to prevent Florida from keeping genuinely obscene material out of schools, nor are they asking for the entire law to be scrapped. However, they take issue with the broad application of the term “pornographic” to books that are far from obscene. 

 

As stated in the lawsuit, “If the State of Florida dislikes an author's idea, it can offer a competing message. It cannot suppress the disfavored message.”


 

 


 

Image: Mike_kiev | Dreamstime.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
The Creative Network

DesignTAXI

The Creative Finder

The Bazaar

Trendingger (BETA)

Status Is Down (BETA)

Community Resources

Become a member

  • Sign up for free
  • Pro/Business Accounts
  • Log into your account

    Forum Rules & Guidelines

    Terms of Use

    DMCA Copyright Notice

    Privacy Policy

    Cookies

    Contact Us

    Advertise with us

  • Express self-serve ads
  • Other advertising inquiries
  • Popular Categories

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)
  • Innovation
  • Accessibility
  • Creative Ad Ideas
  • Climate Change & Sustainability
  • Copyright
  • Humor
  • Inclusivity
  • Travel
  • WTF
  • Creative Disciplines

  • 3D
  • AR / VR
  • Architecture
  • Art
  • Automotive
  • Branding
  • Character Design
  • Comics
  • Fashion Design
  • Furniture Design
  • Graphic Design
  • Illustration
  • Industrial Design
  • Interior Design
  • Logo Design
  • Packaging Design
  • Product Design
  • Street Art
  • Typography
  • UI/UX
  • Video Games